Bank of England Signals Possible December Rate Cut Amid Signs Inflation Has Peaked

 


 In a sharply divided vote, the Bank of England kept its base interest rate at 4 percent on November 6, 2025, but left open the strong possibility of a further cut in December — a signal that financial markets and households alike have construed as a turning point for U.K. monetary policy.

The decision, made by a narrow 5-to-4 split among the nine-member Monetary Policy Committee, reflects a central bank balancing on a tightrope: on one side, the need to guard against persistent inflation; on the other, a weakening economy and warning signs of slack that could stifle growth if rates remain too high.


A Fragile Hold, With One Eye on December

Governor Andrew Bailey, casting the deciding vote, joined four other members in choosing to maintain the Bank Rate at 4%, signaling that he is not yet convinced that disinflation — the gradual easing of inflation — has become durable. But he was clear: if new data continues to support a fall in price pressures, he could turn dovish.

In the minutes released alongside the decision, the Bank noted that inflation likely peaked at a lower level than previously expected. Policymakers projected that if the trend continues, there could be room to cut rates further — potentially as early as the next monetary policy meeting in mid-December, depending critically on the content of the U.K.’s budget.

Four of the MPC members — Sarah Breeden, Dave Ramsden, Swati Dhingra, and Alan Taylor — dissented, explicitly calling for a 25 basis-point cut to 3.75%. Their argument centered on weakening demand, signs of slack in the labor market, and a decreasing risk that inflation would unexpectedly rebound.


Why the Bank Is So Cautious

At face value, the Bank’s decision may appear cautious. But beneath the surface lies a mixture of optimism, guarded bets, and real uncertainty.

Inflation: The Tipping Point

Inflation in the U.K. remains elevated — around 3.8 percent, far above the Bank’s 2 percent target. Yet, according to the BoE, this measure has likely peaked. Key contributors to the slowdown include falling energy prices and a cooling in service-sector inflation. The Bank now projects that inflation will gradually ease, though not immediately collapse to target.

For Governor Bailey, the challenge is to walk the line between acting too soon and risking inflation re-accelerating, versus waiting too long and choking off growth.

Labour Market and Wages

Although there are signs of softening demand, the Bank also sees persistent risks from the labor market. Wage growth, while moderating, remains elevated in some sectors. Some MPC members argue that high wages could re-stoke inflation. Others counter that the labor market may be losing steam, and a rate cut is necessary to prevent job losses from spiraling.

Economic Slack Emerging

According to internal Bank analysis, demand in rate-sensitive parts of the economy — such as construction and utilities — may be leveling off. Surveys of businesses suggest that the drag from higher rates, which had weighed heavily on some sectors, may be peaking. In this sense, monetary policy may have done its most restrictive work already, and further cuts could help prevent a more protracted downturn.

The Budget Wildcard

A major variable in the BoE’s calculus is the U.K. government’s November 26 Budget, which is expected to raise taxes and cut spending in order to rein in public debt. These fiscal tightening moves could dampen demand, offering further justification for a rate cut — but they also risk complicating the inflation outlook.

Bailey has indicated that he wants to see how the Budget plays out before committing to further cuts. That suggests monetary policy will remain reactive for now, and extremely data‑driven.


Splitting the Committee: Divided Views

The 5‑4 vote reflects genuine division within the MPC. The majority — including Bailey — believes that while forward risks have eased, inflation is not yet conclusively on a smooth downward path. They want more confirmation that disinflation is durable.

Bailey, in his public remarks, emphasized the need to “wait and see” whether recent favorable data holds before cutting again. He argued that if disinflation does firm, he would support further easing.

By contrast, the dissenters argue that policy is already restrictive enough, that growth is weak, and that pushing rates higher for longer may do more harm than good. They see policy as overly cautious and favor acting sooner to avoid undermining demand.


What the Markets Think

Financial markets interpreted the Bank’s signal as dovish. Traders and economists alike shifted their expectations, with many now pricing in a 25 basis-point cut at the December meeting. Some went further, speculating that rates could go even lower depending on the Budget and upcoming economic data.

Bond yields dropped modestly in the wake of the decision, and markets broadly anticipated that any future cuts would be gradual rather than steep.

Analysts are also watching closely for signs that the BoE may begin a more sustained easing cycle — one that reflects its view that the restrictive phase may be over and that monetary policy can lean into supporting growth without endangering its inflation mandate.


Implications for Consumers and Businesses

A rate cut in December could have tangible and significant effects on households and firms across the U.K.

For Mortgage Holders

Lower interest rates would likely ease mortgage costs for new borrowers and variable-rate homeowners. This could provide relief to those who have been struggling with high monthly payments in a higher-rate environment.

However, the benefit for existing fixed-rate mortgage holders could be limited in the short run. Many of those mortgages were locked in when rates were higher, and unless refinancing or switching products, they may not see immediate gains.

For Savers

On the flip side, savers would face a potentially shrinking return on their deposits. For many households that depend on interest income, this is a real trade-off. A cut to 3.75 percent (if it happens) would reduce yields on savings accounts, making it more difficult for savers to preserve their purchasing power in a low-return environment.

For Consumers and Businesses

If borrowing becomes cheaper, businesses may respond by increasing investment, especially in rate-sensitive sectors like construction and real estate. Consumers, too, may feel more comfortable spending if financing costs come down, which could help support growth.

Yet, these benefits are not guaranteed. A rate cut could embolden some firms to borrow more, but if demand remains weak, companies may decide against expanding.

On Public Finances

With the Budget looming, a rate cut could offer some breathing room to the government. Lower borrowing costs would ease the burden of public debt. But if fiscal consolidation is front-loaded — meaning tax hikes or spending cuts — the stimulative effect of monetary easing could be partially offset.


Risks and Challenges Ahead

Even as the BoE leans toward cutting rates, it faces a number of critical risks.

  1. Persistent Inflation: If inflation proves sticky — due to wage pressures, energy price shocks, or higher-than-expected services inflation — the Bank could be forced to reverse course. That could undermine credibility.

  2. Fiscal Shock: The November Budget is a major point of uncertainty. If the government introduces more aggressive tax hikes or cuts, it could dampen growth so much that monetary easing alone won’t be enough.

  3. Global Headwinds: External pressures, such as geopolitical risks, supply chain disruptions, or higher interest rates abroad, could undermine the impact of any domestic rate cuts.

  4. Interest Rate Boundaries: There is a limit to how low the BoE can go before it risks pushing rates into territory that could threaten its inflation goal or spark excessive risk-taking.

  5. Communication Risk: With such a narrow split on the MPC, any guidance around future cuts must be carefully calibrated. A misstep could unsettle markets or fuel inflation expectations.


Historical Context: Why This Matters

To appreciate the significance of a potential December cut, it's useful to recall how the BoE got here. Over the past year, the Bank has already cut rates several times, responding to a weakening economy and moderate disinflation. These earlier cuts were aimed at preserving demand while inflation came under control.

But this is not just a continuation of previous easing — the tone has changed. The Bank seems to be signaling a shift from emergency measures toward a more conventional easing phase, provided that inflation continues to move in the right direction.

Some economists see this as part of a broader transition in the U.K. economy: away from emergency-level interest rates and toward a more normalized policy path, aligned with moderate growth and moderate inflation.


Previous Post